How does ethical leadership trickle down? Test of an integrative dual-process model

Author: A Arnaud, A Aron, A Bandura, A Bandura, A Bandura, A Bandura, A Bedi, A Blasi, BI Tepper, BJ Tepper, C Fornell, CC Manz, D Lee, D Liu, DA Hofmann, DM Mayer, DM Mayer, DN Hartog den, DR May, DXH Wo, F Yuan, FO Walumbwa, FO Walumbwa, G Yukl, GR Franke, GR Weaver, H Lian, Haoying Xu, HM Weiss, J Hoobler, J Sumanth, JJ Kish-Gephart, JM Schaubroeck, JM Schaubroeck, JR Boatright, JR Detert, KS Jaussi, L Kohlberg, LJ Walker, LK Treviño, LK Treviño, LK Treviño, LK Treviño, LK Treviño, LK Treviño, LR James, M Betz, ME Brown, ME Brown, ME Brown, MG Pratt, MS Mitchell, NM Ashkanasy, P Ruiz, P Ruiz, P Ruiz-Palomino, P Ruiz-Palomino, PD Bliese, PJ Sweeney, PL Jennings, R Kark, RC Liden, RR Sims, RW Brislin, S Aryee, S Fischbach, ST Hannah, ST Hannah, SW Raudenbush, T Yaffe, TRV Davis, TW Ng, V Venkataramani, Y Li, Y Pan, Yukun Liu, Z Zhang, Zhen Wang
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

ABOUT BOOK

Although the trickle-down effect of ethical leadership has been documented in the literature, its underlying mechanism still remains largely unclear. To address this gap, we develop a cross-level dual-process model to explain how the effect occurs. Drawing on social learning theory, we hypothesize that the ethical leadership of high-level managers could cascade to middle-level supervisors via its impact on middle-level supervisors’ two ethical expectations. Using a sample of 69 middle-level supervisors and 381 subordinates across 69 sub-branches from a large banking firm in China, we found that middle-level supervisors’ ethical efficacy expectation and unethical behavior–punishment expectation (as one form of ethical outcome expectations) accounted for the trickle-down effect. The explanatory role of middle-level supervisors’ ethical behavior–reward expectation (as the other form of ethical outcome expectations), however, was not supported. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed

Powered by: